

So, what should United have done? United was not transparent to the public, "[hiding] behind its own policies". First, the word policy has a negative connotation, and United's "policy" is too old-fashioned, which in turn angered customers even further. Also, United failed to offer an apology or show any empathy during this controversy. United failed to take responsibility for its actions, and highly underestimated the magnitude of this viral video. United should have communicated online with customers as if they were friends, as opposed to using industry jargon. In this situation, customers want to feel safe, and confident in brands that they follow. Due to United's lack of sympathy and responsibility, customers lost their respect for the brand. Brands should always remember the importance of social media today, and how one bad experience offline, can create a national if not global uproar if shared online. Although United did do well by responding, the airline failed to create a personal response, which negatively impacted the view of their brand.
Bailey, great article! The fact that United didn't release a public statement (at least not that I have heard) says volumes about their lack of marketing and PR efforts. These incidences remind me of Chipotle's issues that happened last year. Chipotle essentially saved their brand by offering free chips and queso and making a huge public announcement that they were closing for a day to communicate with and retrain their employees. I haven't heard of United doing anything similar and I have a feeling their brand reputation is going to really suffer. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI also wrote a blog post on this incident last week. United Airlines could've avoided this ordeal had they just offered a sincere apology to Dr. Dao and the public in the first place. Instead CEO Munoz defended their actions as "having to re-accommodate customers." I certainly agree that United did not truly grasp the severity of the situation.
ReplyDelete